<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pacific Breast Pathology &#187; carcinoma in situ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/tag/carcinoma-in-situ/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog</link>
	<description>Pacific Breast Pathology weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Understanding Pathology Results</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/understanding-pathology-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/understanding-pathology-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HER2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  Can you help me understand this report?
Breast Right, biospy:
Infiltrating ductal carcinoma
SBR/Nottingham grade 2/3
Tubular score 2.
Nuclear score 2.
Mitotic score 2 (focal).
No evidence of angiolymphatic invasion
Cancerization og lobules
Ductal carcinoma in situ
Solid, papillary and cribriform patterns
Nuclear grade 2-3
Comedonecrosis present
Microcalcifications associated with in situ malignancy
Immunostains -
Estrogen receptor &#8211; diffuse strong positivity in 97% of tumor cell nuclei
Progesterone receptor [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/understanding-pathology-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History of DCIS in One Breast, Now ADH in the Opposite Breast</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/history-of-dcis-in-one-breast-now-adh-in-the-opposite-breast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/history-of-dcis-in-one-breast-now-adh-in-the-opposite-breast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  In 2006, I had lumpectomy and radiation in right breast following diagnosis of DCIS.  I was 38.  No family history.  First mammogram.  Margins were clear.  I have had MRIs every six months alternating with mammograms every six months.  Two weeks ago, I had a stereotatic biopsy that indicated ADH in the left breast [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/history-of-dcis-in-one-breast-now-adh-in-the-opposite-breast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCIS Diagnosis on Biopsy Reversed by Third and Fourth Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/916/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/916/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I looked for a way to post on your ask the pathologists forum but was unable so here is my question.  I noticed a lump a few months ago and saw my primary care MD, sent for a mammagrom and US.  Mammagram totally normal, no calcifications, US saw the mass and a biospy was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/916/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALH vs. LCIS</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/alh-vs-lcis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/alh-vs-lcis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical lobular hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I am 56 years old and I go for my mammogram every year and my doctor said there were some calcificatons in my right breast and recommends biopsy. So I had a needle biopsy that showed &#8220;lobular carcinoma in situ&#8221; that is what the report said. He said I needed surgery which I dont [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/alh-vs-lcis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Release on Preliminary Data Using Oncotype DX® in DCIS</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/news-release-on-preliminary-data-using-oncotype-dx%c2%ae-in-dcis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/news-release-on-preliminary-data-using-oncotype-dx%c2%ae-in-dcis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 23:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent news release from Genomic Health, Inc. indicates preliminary data shows that the Oncotype DX® test can provide a score predicting risk of local recurrence in patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
DCIS is a very heterogeneous disease and there is disagreement in the breast care community as to how to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/news-release-on-preliminary-data-using-oncotype-dx%c2%ae-in-dcis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCIS and Need for Re-Excision Following Positive Margins</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/845/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/845/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papilloma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Hello, and thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.
March 29th first biopsy done, clinical information and history: Bloody  nipple discharge left breast for 20 months, papilloma suspected,  mammogram clear.  Diagnosis after excision: 1. Low grade DCIS 2. Focal  proliferative fibrocystic changes and small intraductal papilloma 3.  DCIS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/845/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCIS on Core but only ADH on Excision</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/841/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/841/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 21:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I am 40 years old and had my first mammogram 2 months ago. It showed a 5 mm area of micro calcifications. I had a stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy and 8 samples were retrieved. The histopath came back as DCIS &#8211; cribriform, clinging, with a nuclear grade of 2 out of 3. The slides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/841/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Course on High Risk Breast Lesions on Core Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/our-course-on-high-risk-breast-lesions-on-core-biopsy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/our-course-on-high-risk-breast-lesions-on-core-biopsy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical lobular hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat epithelial atypia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papilloma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radial scar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have uploaded a pdf version of our course on high risk lesions on breast core biopsy that we gave last year in San Diego.  We used an audience response system so if you follow through the slides you&#8217;ll see the questions we asked of the audience and the responses that we received in real [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/our-course-on-high-risk-breast-lesions-on-core-biopsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Opinion Pathology Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/second-opinion-pathology-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/second-opinion-pathology-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunohistochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive lobular carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently gave a talk on second opinions in breast pathology at the 21st Annual Conference of the National Consortium of Breast Centers in Las Vegas. A modified version of that talk is available here as a pdf:
Second_Opinion_Pathology
The first part of the talk covers some of the data in the literature and the second part [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/second-opinion-pathology-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/accelerated-partial-breast-irradiation-and-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/accelerated-partial-breast-irradiation-and-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent issue of the journal Cancer there are two interesting articles looking at two types of radiation therapies vs. no radiation for a subset of patients with DCIS.
This has long been a controversy amongst breast care specialists.  Does all DCIS following lumpectomy need to be treated by radiation? Or is there a subset [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/accelerated-partial-breast-irradiation-and-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Book Chapter on High Risk Lesions on Core Needle Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/our-book-chapter-on-high-risk-lesions-on-core-needle-biopsy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/our-book-chapter-on-high-risk-lesions-on-core-needle-biopsy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical lobular hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat epithelial atypia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My radiology colleague from Harvard and I wrote a chapter on how women are being treated differently around the country and the world based on their core needle biopsy diagnosis. I posted the abstract a while back, but now we can publish the manuscript we wrote which is available here as a Word document: High [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/our-book-chapter-on-high-risk-lesions-on-core-needle-biopsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times Article on Second Opinions in Breast Pathology</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-york-times-article-on-second-opinions-in-breast-pathology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-york-times-article-on-second-opinions-in-breast-pathology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t seen this recent article from the New York Times it&#8217;s worth a read.
I have posted before about the importance of getting your breast biopsy diagnosed from a pathologist who specializes in breast pathology.  This article points out how subtle the distinction can be between atypical ductal hyperplasia and low grade ductal carcinoma [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-york-times-article-on-second-opinions-in-breast-pathology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LCIS on Core Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/670/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/670/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat epithelial atypia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Hi I Had a sterotatic biopsy that revealed On the pathology report that I picked up said A. Columnar cell lesion with focal microcalcifications B. Lobular carcinoma in situ. I am so confused My doctor said I have DCIS but its lobular. Treatment plan is  lumpectomy and lymph node aspiration and then 5 years of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/670/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Focal ADH on Core Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/663/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/663/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  Hello, I just received the results of my core biopsy, I would like you opinion on it. Proliferated fibrocystic changes comprised of ductal epithelial hyerlasia with focal atypia, duct single minute microcalcification seen in benign fibrotic tissue. Patient needs surgery consult for breast biopsy. At this point, what do you think my risk is for cancer? I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/663/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Core Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/atypical-ductal-hyperplasia-and-core-biopsy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/atypical-ductal-hyperplasia-and-core-biopsy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: After several years of mammograms showing mild calcifications, this year I was informed that the radiologist saw some mild changes in the calcifications.  I did another mammogram, followed by a core biopsy.  The initial report came back benign, but the final came back as atypical ductal hyperplasia.  I am now scheduled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/atypical-ductal-hyperplasia-and-core-biopsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

