<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pacific Breast Pathology &#187; ductal carcinoma in situ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/tag/ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog</link>
	<description>Pacific Breast Pathology weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>History of DCIS in One Breast, Now ADH in the Opposite Breast</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/history-of-dcis-in-one-breast-now-adh-in-the-opposite-breast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/history-of-dcis-in-one-breast-now-adh-in-the-opposite-breast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  In 2006, I had lumpectomy and radiation in right breast following diagnosis of DCIS.  I was 38.  No family history.  First mammogram.  Margins were clear.  I have had MRIs every six months alternating with mammograms every six months.  Two weeks ago, I had a stereotatic biopsy that indicated ADH in the left breast [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/history-of-dcis-in-one-breast-now-adh-in-the-opposite-breast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCIS Diagnosis on Biopsy Reversed by Third and Fourth Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/916/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/916/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I looked for a way to post on your ask the pathologists forum but was unable so here is my question.  I noticed a lump a few months ago and saw my primary care MD, sent for a mammagrom and US.  Mammagram totally normal, no calcifications, US saw the mass and a biospy was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/916/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Release on Preliminary Data Using Oncotype DX® in DCIS</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/news-release-on-preliminary-data-using-oncotype-dx%c2%ae-in-dcis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/news-release-on-preliminary-data-using-oncotype-dx%c2%ae-in-dcis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 23:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent news release from Genomic Health, Inc. indicates preliminary data shows that the Oncotype DX® test can provide a score predicting risk of local recurrence in patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
DCIS is a very heterogeneous disease and there is disagreement in the breast care community as to how to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/news-release-on-preliminary-data-using-oncotype-dx%c2%ae-in-dcis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCIS and Need for Re-Excision Following Positive Margins</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/845/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/845/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papilloma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Hello, and thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.
March 29th first biopsy done, clinical information and history: Bloody  nipple discharge left breast for 20 months, papilloma suspected,  mammogram clear.  Diagnosis after excision: 1. Low grade DCIS 2. Focal  proliferative fibrocystic changes and small intraductal papilloma 3.  DCIS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/845/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCIS on Core but only ADH on Excision</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/841/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/841/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 21:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I am 40 years old and had my first mammogram 2 months ago. It showed a 5 mm area of micro calcifications. I had a stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy and 8 samples were retrieved. The histopath came back as DCIS &#8211; cribriform, clinging, with a nuclear grade of 2 out of 3. The slides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/841/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Opinion Pathology Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/second-opinion-pathology-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/second-opinion-pathology-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunohistochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive lobular carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently gave a talk on second opinions in breast pathology at the 21st Annual Conference of the National Consortium of Breast Centers in Las Vegas. A modified version of that talk is available here as a pdf:
Second_Opinion_Pathology
The first part of the talk covers some of the data in the literature and the second part [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/second-opinion-pathology-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/accelerated-partial-breast-irradiation-and-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/accelerated-partial-breast-irradiation-and-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent issue of the journal Cancer there are two interesting articles looking at two types of radiation therapies vs. no radiation for a subset of patients with DCIS.
This has long been a controversy amongst breast care specialists.  Does all DCIS following lumpectomy need to be treated by radiation? Or is there a subset [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/accelerated-partial-breast-irradiation-and-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times Article on Second Opinions in Breast Pathology</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-york-times-article-on-second-opinions-in-breast-pathology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-york-times-article-on-second-opinions-in-breast-pathology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t seen this recent article from the New York Times it&#8217;s worth a read.
I have posted before about the importance of getting your breast biopsy diagnosed from a pathologist who specializes in breast pathology.  This article points out how subtle the distinction can be between atypical ductal hyperplasia and low grade ductal carcinoma [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-york-times-article-on-second-opinions-in-breast-pathology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estrogen Receptor Staining in Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/estrogen-receptor-staining-in-breast-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/estrogen-receptor-staining-in-breast-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HER2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I recently had a breast biopsy with invasive ductal carcinoma, grade 3 and ductal carcinoma in situ.  My report said &#8220;the carcinoma is estrogen and progesterone receptor negative (&#60;5%) and negative for her2/neu over-expression (1+).&#8221;  I read online that sometimes even less than 5% could still be positive for the estrogen receptor. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/estrogen-receptor-staining-in-breast-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LCIS on Core Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/670/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/670/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat epithelial atypia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Hi I Had a sterotatic biopsy that revealed On the pathology report that I picked up said A. Columnar cell lesion with focal microcalcifications B. Lobular carcinoma in situ. I am so confused My doctor said I have DCIS but its lobular. Treatment plan is  lumpectomy and lymph node aspiration and then 5 years of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/670/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Focal ADH on Core Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/663/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/663/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  Hello, I just received the results of my core biopsy, I would like you opinion on it. Proliferated fibrocystic changes comprised of ductal epithelial hyerlasia with focal atypia, duct single minute microcalcification seen in benign fibrotic tissue. Patient needs surgery consult for breast biopsy. At this point, what do you think my risk is for cancer? I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/663/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margins on Lumpectomy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/margins-on-lumpectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/margins-on-lumpectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical margins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  Four weeks ago I had a core biopsy with ductal carcinoma in situ and recently had a lumpectomy.  My doctor said there was 2.2 cm of DCIS, high grade with necrosis, margins negative, estrogen receptor negative. He is suggesting radiation therapy but when I went for a second opinion, the pathologist said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/margins-on-lumpectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Core Biopsy of Atypical Micropapillary Hyperplasia and Need for Surgical Biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/core-biopsy-of-atypical-micropapillary-hyperplasia-and-need-for-surgical-biopsy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/core-biopsy-of-atypical-micropapillary-hyperplasia-and-need-for-surgical-biopsy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical ductal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I had a stereotactic core biopsy of cluster of calcifications in the upper inner left breast. Path diagnosis columnar cell change and hyperplasia with focal atypical micropapillary hyperplasia with microcalcifications. surgicial excision is recommended.  From my understanding this is not cancer but has the potential to be cancer down the road.  I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/core-biopsy-of-atypical-micropapillary-hyperplasia-and-need-for-surgical-biopsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/nih-state-of-the-science-conference-statement-on-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ-dcis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/nih-state-of-the-science-conference-statement-on-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ-dcis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is controversy in the breast health care community about using the term &#8220;carcinoma&#8221; for a non-invasive tumor (DCIS or LCIS).  I want to share with you the abstract from the NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Ductal Carcinoma in Situ which was just published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.  There is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/nih-state-of-the-science-conference-statement-on-ductal-carcinoma-in-situ-dcis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could LCIS Be a Real Cancer and Not Just a Marker of Increased Risk?</title>
		<link>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/could-lcis-be-a-real-cancer-and-not-just-a-marker-of-increased-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/could-lcis-be-a-real-cancer-and-not-just-a-marker-of-increased-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PBP Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductal carcinoma in situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobular carcinoma in situ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written before about the controversy over lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and whether it is just a marker of increased risk or possibly a precursor to invasive carcinoma, like ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The reason it was felt to be just a marker of increased risk was that most early studies showed that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacificbreastpathology.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/could-lcis-be-a-real-cancer-and-not-just-a-marker-of-increased-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

