<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seattle Breast Pathology Consultants &#187; invasive ductal carcinoma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/tag/invasive-ductal-carcinoma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Research Supporting the Favorable Prognosis of Tubular Carcinoma</title>
		<link>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-research-supporting-the-favorable-prognosis-of-tubular-carcinoma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-research-supporting-the-favorable-prognosis-of-tubular-carcinoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dr. Lawton's Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive ductal carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathologist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the January 1, 2010 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, a study was released which confirms the belief that tubular carcinomas of the breast have a more favorable prognosis than typical Grade I invasive carcinomas, NST.
I&#8217;ve reported before on invasive carcinomas which have been associated with a more favorable prognosis.  Tubular carcinoma is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/dr_lawtons_blog/new-research-supporting-the-favorable-prognosis-of-tubular-carcinoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estrogen receptor (ER)</title>
		<link>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/estrogen-receptor-er/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/estrogen-receptor-er/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estrogen receptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive carcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive ductal carcinoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: I am confused about my pathology report which says my cancer is invasive ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor negative (less than 10% of cells) and progesterone negative (0% of cells).  Why does it say less than 10% for estrogen receptor is negative?  Doesn&#8217;t that mean some cells are positive? My doctor said since [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/estrogen-receptor-er/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer grading</title>
		<link>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/123/</link>
		<comments>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/123/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drlawton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pathologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive ductal carcinoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:  My report says I have invasive ductal carcinoma, Nottingham grade II, score 7.  What is the difference between grade II and score 7?

Answer:  Invasive cancers are graded using the Nottingham system.  Your pathologist looks at your cancer and evaluates three things, each of which gets a number from 1-3.  Then these three numbers are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.breastpathologyconsults.com/blog/ask_the_pathologist/123/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
